home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Hi,
-
- > I'm just back from hollidays, so I can answear you.
-
- I heard from Bertrand a couple of days ago, so I guess we're back in business.
-
- > First of all, I've started to code dview in 68030.
-
- :-)
-
- > Actually, I'm coding the wad loading for levels...
-
- Shouldn't be very hard I hope.
-
- > I haven't seen the very last version of dview030, but if you modify
- > dview, please, put a comment to tell me it, coz if I have already translated
- > the part of code, I'll propably won't see the modif.
-
- I'm not sure what version you have, but I've not done anything to DVIEW
- for some time. Can the version you have omit the floor/ceiling drawing by
- pressing 'n'? I think that's that last thing I added.
-
- > I'd like to know if in the version of dview that I translate you modified
- > part of the code, coz in some levels, I think there are some bugs ( I mean
- > that some walls disappear when we approach them .)
-
- If you mean the C version, there are a couple of changes that may not be
- obvious, but I've never seen anything be displayed wrongly because of them.
- If you turn on the memory savings ('F' and 'W') there are some problems,
- though.
- Are you sure that you're not just too close to the walls?
-
- It would help if you could tell me where you get the display errors.
-
- > In fact, I'll recode the true color mode directly, but I really don't
- > know why the TC mode generates bugs, as you only changed the way to access
- > the screen.
-
- Uh, I don't think I follow you there. What TC mode?
- Sure, DVIEW would be better off running in TC, but I haven't written the
- code to make it do that. It certainly shouldn't be hard to add, it's just
- that my computer crashes when I switch to TC, probably because of NVDI.
-
- > #if 0
- > blablabla
- > #endif
-
- 'blablalba' has been removed for some reason. That the code is still there
- indicates that I was not sure it was a good idea to remove it or that I
- kept the old code around for clarity.
-
- > #if 1
- > blablabla
- > #endif
-
- 'blablabla' was removed earlier but the reinserted. I usually do this
- when I'm not sure what to do about it.
-
- > I think that you coded that and it doesn't really need to be coded in 68030.
- > Am I wrong ?
-
- Well, if the expression after #if is true (not zero) then the code _is_
- used and should be converted.
- Are there any places where it's unclear?
-
- Regards,
- Johan
-
- --
- Chalmers University | Why are these | e-mail: d8klojo@dtek.chalmers.se
- of Technology | .signatures | rand@cd.chalmers.se
- | so hard to do | www/ftp: rand.thn.htu.se
- Gothenburg, Sweden | well? | (MGIFv5 and QLem)
-
-